Categories
Business Strategy

Chapter 7 of Building A High Performing Team on Purpose – Your Employee Value Proposition



“So…what is your culture like?”

“Well, we like to go for drinks on Friday nights once a month. Um, we also went bowling last quarter, that was great fun. In the office we like to have a bit of banter, but we all get the job done in the end.”

“Awesome!”

 Yes.  All those things are great fun and who doesn’t like going for drinks, bowling and banter? The trouble with this answer is that:

  1. It is not really an accurate answer about the company culture and doesn’t give much information.
  2. Given this is a similar response to a lot of other companies, it doesn’t differentiate you and therefore is not a source of competitive advantage where it comes to attracting and retaining talent.
  3.  It doesn’t cover the important components of what actually attracts and retains people.

There are a few reasons why most businesses have a similarly vague, non-distinctive and surface-level response to this question.  The reason for this is that most businesses:

  • Don’t properly think through their Employee Value Proposition (EVP)
  • Are not hearing what other managers are saying, because they are not sitting in on their interviews
  • Are not looking objectively at their company in the context of their target market for talent

To this last point, it is sometimes the case that business owners and leaders overstate the attractiveness of their company.  They are viewing it subjectively having grown it with their own blood, sweat and tears.  It’s like their baby and so how could they not think others should love it?  

Conversely, some business leaders don’t think they can compete for top talent, believing that only the big players who pay the large salaries and bonuses can attract the best. 

If you’re going to build a high performing team on purpose, you need to have an approach to attracting and retaining talent.  This requires you to have a clear and compelling Employee Value Proposition (EVP).


What is an EVP?

An Employee Value Proposition is the communication and delivery of the total rewards for employees in return for joining, staying and performing at an organisation.  This is the value that the employee gets from the company.  A good employee value proposition cuts through the rhetoric and clichés and instead, provides a clear message to a distinct group of people. 


Be clear on your target audience

It’s important to be clear on your target market of who you want to attract and what they value.  What is perhaps even more important is who you don’t want to attract.  Does this sound familiar?  If you said “yes”, then you might be thinking about your Customer Value Proposition (CVP) that has similar aspects to it.  

Knowing who you best serve and who you don’t from a customer perspective helps you to deliver differentiated value to your target market.  The same goes for employees.


Think through the below questions:


Is your company more attractive to people who:

  1. Like parties and social functions or to those who love learning?                                                                                                                           
  2. Like earning big bonuses or achieving work/life balance?                                                                                                                   
  3. Prefer a formalised environment or a casual informal environment?                                                                                                                   
  4. Value diversity or are more homogenous in the type of people in the business?                                                                                                                   
  5. Live in and around the city or prefer the suburbs?                                                                                                                   
  6. Love your products and services, or are your products and services agnostic to the enjoyment of people’s jobs (e.g. Widgets R US)?                                                                                                                   
  7. Values speed and fast delivery, versus those who prefer premium and more involved?                                                                                                                   
  8. Embraces technology versus old school approaches?


These contrasts are not always diametrically opposed (e.g. even if you have great social functions, you will of course need people to value learning) and some may not be relevant (e.g. you may have both branches in the city and in the outer suburbs). The point of this list is not to be exhaustive, but a thought starter.  The important factor here is that, much like with your strategic position with your customers, if you try and please everyone, you will please no one. 

It’s important to note that this doesn’t mean you have a one-size-fits-all approach on everything, as having a diverse population of employees with different interests and perspectives is valuable to avoid groupthink.  

Those of you who know me and have discussed the topic may have had the discussion about how paying for gym memberships is usually a big waste of money.  People who want to go to the gym are happy to pay for it and have their preferred club that they choose to go to.  Those who take a free membership tend to be people who think they want to go to the gym, but don’t really. 

What I’m talking about is at the core of your business.  What is the inimitable offering you give your employees that they simply cannot find anywhere else and who are the people who will value this above any other offering or reward?


Place yourself in their shoes

The ability to properly empathise, by placing ourselves in the shoes of others is one of the most important life skills we need.  Business owners and founders in particular often feel misunderstood.  

In fact, the very nature of why they got into business in the first place is often because when they worked in a job, their manager was not forward-thinking enough to take onboard their ideas – so they started their own company. 

The biggest misconceptions about an overall offer to employees are that:

  • It’s mostly about the money;
  • It’s better to have a lower base salary and higher bonus component (because that is what business owners have for their remuneration);
  • People will leave you if they get a “better” offer elsewhere;
  • Millennials have no loyalty; and,
  • You can pay someone lower to begin with, then if they prove themselves, you can give them a pay increase.

I have had people argue until they are blue in the face that paying bonuses drives results.  It’s not that they are lying, they are actually seeing results – but what results are we talking about? 

I won’t cover the correct design of incentive programs here, as it is a detailed topic however, bonuses are used a lot more than they should.  The people implementing them only focus on the outcomes they believe they achieved, rather than what they didn’t achieve and what they adversely affected.  


Turn up what’s important, turn down what isn’t

Are you a learning organisation?   Is that core to your strategy to beat the competition and provide innovation?  Is everything about delivering a premium tailored service?  Knowing who you are as a business and who you are not helps to attract people who value the same thing.  

If you then work hard to offer an employment experience that is better than others in a smaller number of areas and at least ok in all the other important areas, then for those who value what you are best at it’s harder for people to leave and go elsewhere.   More so, they will stay not because they feel they have to, but because they are having a fulfilling experience. 

People often use the example of Steve Jobs, who by many accounts was not a good people leader.  As a thought leader though, he was exceptional.  People who justify why you can get away with not being a good people leader do so in order to support an existing incorrect perspective.  Unless you are Steve Jobs or an equivalent genius, you can’t be as bad of a people leader as he apparently was.  

Also, what we don’t hear about are all the people who probably left due to his behaviour towards him.  Most of us are not the equivalent of Steve Jobs in the forward-thinking genius category, so we need to be at least an ok leader.  Then we need to offer a small number of areas that are better than companies who compete for our talent.

How does what you have to offer compare to other offers your target market is considering?  If you are a small-medium business, it is difficult to compete with larger businesses on their strengths.  If your target market of employee is weighing up working for you versus a larger player, it’s best to focus on strengths they don’t have.  

For example, in a smaller business an employee can have greater opportunities to work on a range of activities faster than in a large business that has much more specialised roles.

Most importantly and what is critical to your Customer Value Proposition, is: what is the problem you are solving for your target market?  What is the pain you are alleviating?  For example, if you are a high potential graduate looking to further your career, typical problems can include:

  • Companies want you to have two years’ industry experience
  • You are concerned about locking in a career without knowing what the work is actually like
  • You won’t receive proper training, mentoring and guidance to learn
  • There is a lack of career development and opportunities

Ensuring that you address these pain points properly and communicate what you do in a compelling way will help you to attract and retain this type of employee.  Compare this to a person of a similar age who is not yet ready to go fully into their career and is more focused on travelling and gaining life experiences.  If this were your target market, your proposition would be different if you wanted to address their pain points.


What should be included in an EVP?

So now that you are getting an idea that you need to be clear on who you are and the type of people you are targeting, who need to have similar values to the core of who your business is, it’s time to get specific on what you are offering as your value proposition.

The company purpose

This is the “why” of your company, as Simon Sinek would say.  People are looking for inspiration and want to be part of something bigger than just making profit, being the “industry leader” or being the best.  What is key to your company purpose?  You need to have a human impact.  

We feel good when we have made a difference to other people, so long as we can have a level of appreciation and affinity with those people.  This doesn’t mean you have to be a charitable organisation, in fact, your purpose shouldn’t relate to your charitable foundations unless you are a not-for-profit.  Your charities and social causes can form part of your overall proposition, but it’s not your purpose in most cases.


The work

The work itself is so important to the enjoyment of work from a day-to-day perspective.   What steps have you taken to make the job enjoyable?  Have you taken out all the unpleasant or boring bits through your processes, technology, outsourcing and/or support structure?  Are you clear and disciplined on your customer strategy so you only deal with customers in your target market who love what you do?  Have you taken what is seemingly an unpleasant job and made it fun?  

Think about the famous Pike Place Fish Market in Seattle where they throw the fish around and yell out at each other.  What sort of person would love working there?  Do you think they need to be paid big bonuses, or do they attract people because of the fun environment, opportunity to entertain, famous name and the chance to be yourself (if you are highly extroverted and energetic)?

Let me put it straight to you: Enjoyable, fun and fulfilling jobs in a great environment are more attractive than crappy, boring, frustrating jobs in an annoying environment.


Career development

A lot of people in job interviews talk about wanting to “grow”.  Often I wonder whether they know what that really means to them and the work required to truly “grow”.   Growth can be challenging and true growth is often not very enjoyable at all.  Nonetheless, many people want to feel like they are getting better and improving their knowledge and capability.  Whether or not they are up for the task of doing so is another story.  

What is important is that you have the opportunity for people to learn and develop in their own way.   Not everyone is capable and willing to climb the ladder.   Knowing this and applying an approach to help people feel they are progressing, without everyone having to reach CEO level is important for most EVPs.  


Leadership and culture

This is a more difficult one to convince anyone of.  Leaders of businesses will often describe what they are doing to create a great culture, but in reality it is often not what takes place.  Think less about the gimmicks that you have in your company. Avoid headlining your culture with your social events unless that is what you want to be known for above most other things.  

What’s more important is the day-to-day.  What are the indicators in your business that demonstrate what people are like and how they work with each other?  What is your approach to giving feedback and performance?  What is your approach to leadership?  How is feedback gained and acted upon?   

All of these things can of course be espoused without actually taking place effectively in real life.  So what’s the difference?  Sometimes it’s the smell test.  Some of you may use observations of candidates when you are hiring as part of your criteria, so observe their behaviour during the process (which is a good thing to do if done properly).  

Many top candidates are also doing the same thing with you.  What is important is that your leadership and culture is authentic to how you describe it.  You will be surprised how much can be revealed by you during your own hiring process.


Financial rewards and benefits

There are important questions here: 

  • What are you rewarding?
  • How are you rewarding?
  • When are you rewarding?
  • Who are you rewarding?

The answers to these questions will communicate to your employees and prospective employees what you value.

Just as a side note, you should avoid Employee of the Month programs.  They are fraught with danger and essentially it is exciting for one person, a non-event for some and demotivating for others.  You are highlighting one person’s efforts for the month and may not be acknowledging what anyone else did for that month. 

In terms of monetary benefits, in most cases I don’t think they should be a primary part of your EVP.  That is unless they form part of your core proposition that is valuable to your target market.  For example, if you are a travel agent and are wanting to attract people who love travel and can talk passionately about travelling adventures, then clearly having benefits related to travel such as significant discounts and extra annual leave is going to align perfectly.  

However, that same set of benefits in another business that doesn’t have the same target market will not be as valuable overall to the employees or company.  It will still be enjoyed, but anything you spend time and money on is in place of something else you could have directed your resources towards. You need to be deliberate and discerning. 

As a general practice these days, lifestyle benefits, such as flexible working, are more important in most cases than financial perks.  Financial perks can be valuable, but again they need to be relevant to the target market.


Articulating your EVP

Much like your Customer Value Proposition, your Employee Value Proposition needs to identify the target market of employees.  You may even have sub-categories of employees based on the different divisions and teams within your business.  To take a simple and commonly used structure, see below:

 For [target market] who are looking to [goal] but [pain point], we provide [value to target employees] because [what makes it true].  Best of all [special sauce]. (“Special sauce” is something extra, that makes the main part of your offering even better).


For example…


For HR and psychology graduates who are looking to develop their careers and spend their days analysing human performance at work, IPX Group provides a learning environment designed to rapidly develop your skills, knowledge and capability.  Here’s what makes this true:

We don’t hire people from the industry, because we invest a lot of time and energy into teaching our team our unique methods.  We therefore hire people who have strong learning agility, a thirst for learning and who are highly interested in human behaviour. 

  • We provide services to small-medium businesses across a large range of HR disciplines, so there is opportunity to learn across a diverse range of topics and find out what you really love. 
  • We work across a range of industries and our model is only successful when we work in strong collaboration with our clients, getting to know their businesses in detail.  This means that you will learn about how the world works through other people’s businesses.  
  • We have a documented and structured competency framework that forms the basis of your development plan, so you will always know your development path and be rewarded for learning. 
  • Because our services to our clients include training and development on high performance behaviours, you get to participate in the same training and development we provide externally, whilst being paid for your time.
  • You are encouraged to be yourself, but the best version of yourself.  This is because part of our offering to our clients is that we are transparent and honest, so there is no need to pretend you are something you are not nor to ever be untruthful to clients.
  • Best of all, because our hiring process is based on the same rigorous methods we use with our clients, you will join a team of like-minded individuals who have all met the same standard.


Key Takeaways

  • Be unique and specific to your target audience of employees. What is it that they truly value and appreciate in a workplace? Also, remember to think about who aren’t your target audience of employees.
  • Empathise. Don’t think that your employees are going to like what you like. It’s about having more than a surface level assumption and to know that even within your target audience of employees there are going to be differences as well. 
  • Whilst you can include multiple rewards, don’t include so many benefits that your EVP becomes diluted. Be clear on what you offer employees that’s valuable to them, that’s unique to your business and play to your strengths rather than trying to compete with other companies who play on their own strengths.


Actions

  • Think about your best employees past and present. Why do you think they enjoy working at your company? Why do you think they’ve stayed? Better yet, ask them. You might be surprised at their answers. 
  • Think through and possibly discuss with others, what is unique about your business and what value can you provide to that group of employees. 
  • What are the alternative options for these employees within or outside of your industry?  What are the strengths and weaknesses of what others potentially offer? Looking through the categories in the section ‘What should be included in your EVP’, what can you offer both present and in the future that can add value to your employees? If you don’t have much in place now, that’s okay. Think about what you want to have in place and make a plan.
  • Draft how you communicate it and speak to someone who has very little understanding of your business and has no reason to tell you it’s good when it’s not and explain it to them.

You can read Chapter 6: Learning and Development by clicking here.

Categories
Business Strategy

Chapter 6 of Building A High Performing Team on Purpose – Learning and Development.

Why training initiatives often fail

“We sent them on a training course to fix a weakness they had.  They returned and loved the session, stating that whilst there were a number of concepts they already knew, they still enjoyed the session and took a lot out of it.  Now, let’s get back to the core business, the real work…”

I’ve mentioned in earlier sections about the dopamine fix that we get when we think we have completed something, but haven’t.  There is perhaps no bigger place for this to take place than completing training.  Actually, it’s more when others have completed training, because when they do so they are fixed, right?

You might be thinking that’s an odd thing to write in a series about building a high performing team on purpose, that I begin with challenging the value of training. 

Shouldn’t you be suggesting we train our people as much as possible?

Well, sort of. 

There is a measure that is sometimes tracked in organisations to identify whether targets have been met in learning and development.  One of the easiest measures is the number of hours/days spent in training.  These kinds of measures can be useful in large organisations where the political environment requires an irrefutable metric of success. 

The same thing happens at an individual manager and employee level, where the solution to a gap in an employee’s skill, knowledge or capability is to send them on a training program – or a group training session for the whole team.  When an employee gets an offer to spend a day or two away from the office to receive training, they often jump at the chance. They come back to the office and talk about how valuable it was and that it was enjoyable.  It’s enjoyable to get paid to spend time in a workshop where the thinking is done for you and you get to enjoy as much coffee, mints, egg sandwiches and sushi as you want. Many managers and employees have an addiction to training.  

But is it really improving the performance of anyone?

Now let me be clear, there can definitely be significant benefits gained from training and it is essential to building a high performing team on purpose.  It’s just that if a manager is not truly passionate about learning and development, then they view the action of sending someone on a course as being enough.  It’s easy to send an email approving them to go and feels good to think you are actually doing something.  That dopamine fix feels good and we tell people that we send our team on x days training per year.

But in actual fact, in many cases it achieved very little value for the business.


Ask yourself how many of the below points have applied to a training initiative that has taken place in your business?

  1. Is the training tied back to the business strategy?                                                                                                                                                                              
  2. Are the learning outcomes linked back to expectations in the workplace that will improve performance?                                                                                                                                                                              
  3. Did each manager meet with their direct reports and agree expectations before the training?                                                                                                                                                                              
  4. Did each manager or someone else provide ongoing coaching on the skills, knowledge and/or capabilities required?                                                                                                                                                                              
  5. Did the manager follow up to confirm if the skills, knowledge and/or capabilities have been applied effectively?                                                                                                                                                                              
  6. Has there been an overall review of the training initiative against measures of success (and what improvements are needed for next time)?                                                                                                                                                                              
  7. Is the training supplementing a practice of continuous learning at work (as opposed to an initiative that sits outside the day to day)?

If you didn’t answer “Yes” to all of the above questions, chances are you are leaving value on the table.  If this were the case, a question to ask yourself is:


Was this due to a lack of knowledge, or a lack of motivation from your senior leaders to truly create a culture of learning?

With such little success from many training initiatives, it is easy for those senior managers who don’t truly believe in learning and development to not view it as a worthwhile investment.  On top of that, if a company has high turnover of employees many view it as money down the drain.  In a downturn such as right now in the COVID-19 crisis, training budgets get slashed because it is considered non-essential. 

This problem is perhaps even greater when we look at small-medium businesses.  Smaller companies struggle to provide sufficient new entrant training, let alone taking individual employee development to the next level.  

The barriers faced for such businesses are greater than for large corporations, because they usually don’t have a person whose job it is to train people and so this is left up to the manager.  Most managers in SMEs are not properly trained in how to train and are often dealing with day-to-day issues when their new starter joined. 

Coupled with the fact that they are usually hiring one person at a time, holding structured classroom training is simply not an option and competency assessment is usually an after-thought.  Most new starters are therefore left to shadow the existing team, who may not may not be showing them the right things in the right way.  

The result is that the particular techniques and knowledge that helped grow the business in the first place are lost or at best, diluted as the business grows.  Hence, sending someone external for classroom training becomes a much more attractive option.


The difficulty with trying to make adults learn

We are a funny bunch.  Adults.  We really like to do our own thing.  From around age 16 our brains develop in a way that programs us to reject information that doesn’t fit with what we think we know.  Parents often complain that their teenage kids think they know everything and find it frustrating that their previous methods of teaching their children are no longer working.  The correct information that parents are trying to impart to their kids goes in one ear and out the other, with teenagers preferring to make sense of the world themselves.

This is not too dissimilar to the experience that companies have with training existing employees on new ways of working.  We also go where the energy takes us, mostly towards what we like and away from what we don’t.  Once we are established in a business or industry, we like the fact that we know things are in a groove.  We identify with our existing knowledge and anything that threatens this identity is rejected.  Think of that parent trying to tell their 16-year-old that their new style of clothes doesn’t look very good. 

Our identity and our view of ourselves is one of the most valuable things we have.  For some people it is an obsession.  You see this on social media as a giveaway of what the masses think.  People love taking those surveys that categorise them into which Brooklyn 99 character they are most like.  Or perhaps showing video footage of what is “Literally (read figuratively) me!”.

Below are three key problems that exist with trying to make adults learn in 2020…


We are fighting against the learner’s self-identity

Part of the problem with training interventions is that they can conflict with a learner’s self-identity.  Our identity or status as a person is one of the most important things in the world to us.  When I say status, I don’t mean necessarily a fancy car or title, I am talking about how we view ourselves and how we want the world to view us.  

If a person views themselves as being a sales professional and then gets sent to a sales training course with others in their team who they don’t rate as sales professionals, they will be more likely to reject the content or else show the other learners what they know already.  

There is a need to maintain the self-identity that they are a sales professional and this can prevent them from being open to learning something new – if they think they know it already.  But there is a massive difference between knowing about a concept and actually applying it effectively in your job. 

Conversely, if a person is a sales professional, but identify themselves as someone who loves to learn and values learning, they may approach the learning with a more open mind.  They may even want to appear open and to make mistakes to allow others to learn more as well.  

What is even better is this person can become part of the learning creation, by contributing knowledge, feedback and content towards learning programs.  Perhaps even through a forum similar to social media, which is how people are doing so in their personal lives.  As I often say to managers implementing a change or new program – leave something for the critics.  A perfect training solution is not the perfect solution.


People have lower attention spans

People say they are time poor.  That’s not the case.  

 

People no longer have the need to expend energy on things they don’t like anywhere near as much as before.  

Most people don’t want to read a 10 minute article when they can watch a 2 minute video.  There will only be a small proportion of people who have read this far.  I know this because only a small proportion of people truly want to learn what it takes to build a high performing team on purpose.  Well done to you, and I mean that.

Speaking of watching things, before Netflix, before even Foxtel you had to watch Abbot and Costello do their “Who’s on first” routine on a Saturday afternoon if you wanted to watch something entertaining on TV.  For most people these days, unless they have a TV series they are binge watching, an evening on Netflix involves about an hour of flicking between shows they can’t be bothered getting into. 

There is a greater need today to provide learning experiences.  Learning systems need to go beyond LMSs (Learning Management Systems) and provide a learning experience similar to the engagement people are used to from the content they are constantly consuming (which is a lot of video) and social media they are accessing every day.  

If users can share and rate content, have their favourite playlists etc. then these learning practices can become lifelong practices.  They need to then bring this back into their day-to-day jobs for this information to truly become knowledge.


We need to see the relevance and it needs to be practical

There is a need for the learner to buy-in to the learning before it can take place.  With so many messages coming our way each day, our brains are highly attuned to filtering out what we consider irrelevant.  Much like in a sales process, your product or service may be the best out there, but until your prospect knows they have a problem or they are feeling a pain point, there is no motivation to buy.  

Buying is the exchange of energy for more energy.   You give money, which takes energy and you get a product or service that gives you more energy.  Learning works the same way.  You give time, money and effort towards learning and in return you get back more energy.  Energy in the form of better performance, less stress, more money, more confidence. 

Even when the time is paid for by the company, the money is covered by training budgets, there is still the energy to learn and the energy to apply the learning.  So it has to be considered relevant to the learner or else they will switch off.  Help learners solve real life problems that make their lives easier.  Translate concepts into their daily rhythm. 

The problem with training workshops is that only a small proportion of participants will have the learning ability and motivation to translate the content into action.  These people are usually your high potentials and high performers.  Learning only happens when there is a change in the person who has learnt.  

A golf instructor can explain to you how to swing a golf club and you could memorise this information and recite it back.  But does that mean you know how to actually hit a golf ball properly?  No.  You would need to head to the driving range and practice, with your instructor providing feedback along the way.  This example is so easy to understand because of its practical nature.  Yet so many managers think that explaining to an employee what they need to do equates to training them.  It makes no sense, yet is happening every day in businesses. 

Another common practice managers love is shadowing, because they can place a new joiner with a somewhat experienced person and imagine the knowledge transfer through osmosis.  Never mind that the existing employee is doing some things the wrong way, they lack skill in training people and don’t know what it is specifically they are meant to train them in.  The result of this is the new person is not trained properly. 


We need to make learning part of the fabric of the organisation

It’s not enough for training to be a side activity that takes place so we can tick that box.  If you want to truly build a high performing team on purpose, your approach to learning and development needs to permeate through the very fabric of your business.  You need to define what is strategically important, create a learning culture and give people learning experiences.

Now that you have read through a series of chapters that provide the foundations for you to build a high performing team on purpose, it’s worthwhile reflecting back where we are at.  The true power of each chapter is not for it to stand alone, but to work together.  You cannot simply hire great talent and lead them poorly.  Similarly, if you don’t have a clear business strategy and define the important competencies to develop, your training initiatives won’t provide a competitive advantage or further your strategy.


As a reminder, the chapters we have covered so far:

  1. Get your team back to work safely and trusting in you as a leader (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/transitioning-your-workforce-back-after-covid-19-tommy-sim/)
  2. Have a strategy for your business that has trade offs on what is important and what isn’t (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/three-reasons-you-probably-dont-have-right-business-strategy-sim/)
  3. Design your organisation around your strategy, which goes beyond simply a chart, but encapsulates the processes, performance measures, communication and investment in how the organizational energy flows (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chapter-3-building-high-performing-team-purpose-your-job-tommy-sim/)
  4. Invest in the right leadership who can help deliver on your strategy, ensuring you don’t miscast pure individual contributors into leadership roles (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chapter-4-building-high-performing-team-purpose-your-leadership-sim/)
  5. Bring in the right talent that supports you organizational design and who can learn what is needed for your strategy (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chapter-5-building-high-performing-team-purpose-your-talent-tommy-sim/)


I’ll give you an example:

  • Let’s just say a big part of your strategy is to provide your clients with the most valuable insights into data that will help them further their business.
  •  Your organisational design needs to look at how your business will have the capability to do so, from your defined positions, to your processes, your systems and your talent
  • You will need to hire talent who are predisposed to be good at things such as: analytical thinking, strategic thinking, numerical reasoning and communication.
  • You need to have the right leaders capable of understanding your strategy, who capture the hearts and minds of the team towards that direction and to focus on developing people to your needed capability
  • Your training initiatives need to support the systems, processes, thinking and other important aspects of what you need to deliver in your strategy

This example is very high level, but hopefully it shows how each aspect I have written about needs to support one another for you to truly build a high performing team on purpose.  Each item is also not discrete from one another.  For example, your leaders and people you hire impact on the success of training, because it only works properly by creating a learning culture.


Create a learning culture

If you are going to build a high performing team on purpose, you must have a culture that values learning. Otherwise, any high performance will be short-lived as your competitors are learning faster than you.  A learning culture is made up of a collection of individuals who value learning above most other things and have a natural energy towards learning that goes beyond what is asked of them from the business.  It must be led from the top and the people who hire into the business need to share these values.

Take an example of the two sales professionals: Person A rejects learning and Person B supports and leads learning.  Now think of a company that is full of either Person A or Person B and you have yourself a non-learning culture and a learning culture.  But the harsh reality is that not all people in an organisation have equal influence.  It’s the people at the top who have the most power over what takes place and what people value at work.  So as a leader, if you don’t value learning yourself, then what makes you think that any of your team will value learning?


“I’m already highly knowledgeable, once the rest of the team reaches my level then I will invest in my learning.”


It doesn’t work like that.  It’s not a logical debate.  We’re talking about people here and people follow what the leader’s actions show that they value.  It’s like looking at someone’s feet in a standing group conversation.  If your feet are pointing towards the door you are wanting to leave.  If one person is listening to another person, but their foot is pointing towards a different person then they are just waiting for the sentence to end before they can direct things where they want.  A learning culture starts at the top and needs to be authentic. What’s good for them needs to be good for you.  You then need to hire people who have an ability to learn and a motivation to learn. 


Give learning experiences

Learning is not just about training.  People need to have the opportunity to apply what they have learnt in a safe environment, where mistakes are highly valued as learning experiences.  As a business owner or leader, you may have learnt in a sink or swim situation, but that doesn’t mean that is suitable for others. 

For every success story from a sink or swim situation there were 99 failures that you have forgotten about.  So it’s important though to not set people up to fail, as this will be counter-productive.  You may do so unintentionally, as you might believe the person can do the assignment you are wanting them to complete.  However, if you have mis-diagnosed their strengths and actually thrown them into a task that exposes their weaknesses, you might be bringing their time with you to a premature end. 

Giving people more learning experiences that enable them to grow and be successful is also likely to improve your retention of talent.   People who are able to best utilise their talent and continue to build on their strengths are likely to be more fulfilled in their jobs.  This makes it a lot more difficult to leave their current position as they feel more connected to the environment that is providing that fulfillment.  Once that no longer exists, they will look for that in other places.


Questions to ask yourself 

  • What is the capability that your business needs to have to supports your strategy? 
  • How can you best develop this with new starters? 
  • How can you continue to develop this throughout the career journey for your people?
  • How do you create a culture of learning to encourage employees to bring in relevant new knowledge and capability, sharing it with others?


Key take-aways

  • Small businesses do not have the same learning and development resources and large businesses and often struggle to train new entrants properly because they are hiring one at a time
  • They are also susceptible to people leaving for career opportunities elsewhere, given the relative limited opportunities for new experiences
  • There is a need to develop new competencies and to retrain staff in new ways of working to get the most value out of technological advancement
  • There is a growing trend where the way people learn is more in more personal, social, integrated with work and to support continuous lifelong learning